New season, new coach, new players. Let’s have a new CEO then, shall we?
After 27 years with the club, 13 as the CEO, Mike Rush is stepping down from the role. The timing – just days after Jon Wilkin shook up the rugby league world with an attempt at some actual insight – whiffs ever so slightly of something which was not part of the plan going into the season.
It brings to an end what has to be regarded as a hugely successful tenure for Rush. A club statement reassured us that the search for a replacement has begun amid mischievous suggestions online – and not just from Wiganers – that this could be the start of a downward trajectory for Super League’s most successful club.
Rush joined Saints in 1999 and held several other roles before becoming CEO in 2013. He has been involved with strength and conditioning, acted as assistant coach and even a joint tenure as interim head coach alongside Keiron Cunningham.
Yet it was his work with the Saints youth department for which he was most often associated and rightly lauded. It’s probably not a coincidence that in the time he has spent with the club it has fostered a reputation as one of the best clubs in the world for youth development.
An incalculable number of players have come through from the academy to the first team during his time. Not all have stayed with the club – some moving on to forge careers at other clubs – but he would be within his rights to count those as successes also. Not every youth product is going to be James Roby or Jack Welsby.
But for a time Rush knew how to mix the best of that talent with quality reinforcements from elsewhere. Since 1999 Saints have won nine Grand Finals, six Challenge Cups and three World Club titles. We have seen the likes of Jamie Lyon and Ben Barba wearing the red vee in sides that were still able to retain that flavour of home grown talent.
Roby, Welsby, Jonny Lomax, Mark Percival, Regan Grace, Luke Thompson, Tommy Makinson, Morgan Knowles and Matty Lees have all come through during that time. Now there is the next generation yet to show us their absolute peak in the likes of Harry Robertson, Owen Dagnall, Noah Stephens and George Whitby.
His belief in a successful youth system has not diminished. In a now infamous interview with Sky Sports Rush suggested that he would like to see the first team comprised of 70-80% youth products. This seemed like an unrealistic goal at the time, inspiring a cynical response from the likes of this writer who felt it might be a signpost that the club no longer wishes to spend any of its hard earned on quality recruits from outside.
It suggested there would not be any imminent arrivals of slightly wayward but supremely gifted NRL stars. Certainly the recruitment in the last couple of years since the departure of Kristian Woolf as head coach has hardly been spellbinding. This isn’t a fan base who will endure too many seasons of finishing outside the top four while we wait for another Class Of 92 style influx of ready made superstars to grace the first team. Yes the club has had a fantastic record during his time but you cannot keep producing at that rate.
The fans were getting slightly restless about what they saw as the beginnings of a decline at the time of that interview. It didn’t help that Rush referred to our criticism as ‘outside noise’, as if it were nothing but inconsequential yapping that shouldn’t be listened to or taken seriously. Nobody seriously expects a CEO to listen to Dave on Twitter and base recruitment strategy around his thoughts but at the same time you cannot dismiss fan opinion. When you do that you come across as fairly arrogant. And arrogance without success is an ugly look.
But it is not those comments which seem to have hastened his departure but those of Wilkin. In an explosive tirade during coverage of the 2026 Super League opener between York Knights and Hull KR the former Saints forward made some startling claims.
Anybody sleepily waiting for him to assert that ‘he’ll be disappointed with that, Brian’ about an in game incident would have had their gast well and truly flabbered by his thoughts. He claimed that the club treated former head coach and Wilkin’s mate Paul Wellens badly. Wilkin suggested that the club offered Wellens the incentive of a new contract should he reach the Grand Final while in actuality they had already made their minds up to replace him.
Wellens didn’t get anywhere near that Grand Final so it is perhaps a moot point. But the club have still felt the need to deny these claims in their statement announcing the departure of Rush. They say Wellens was kept informed about plans for the coaching position throughout last season. He has eventually been replaced by Paul Rowley after a sixth place finish which even Wilkin would find hard to trumpet.
But that wasn’t all. Amid reports in the rugby league media that Percival could be on his way out of the club Wilkin made another revelatory claim. He suggested that a two-year contract offered to Percival has now ‘disappeared’.
I feel it slightly unlikely that a contract could disappear in the digital age and with so many people invested in the deal, from club officials to agents to Percival and his family. The club’s version of events is that the centre was offered a contract verbally but that this was never ratified by the board.
So while it has been framed as a withdrawal of an offer, the club say no such formal offer was ever made. Meanwhile, the reporters continue to link Percival with the exit. The fresh Hell of Huddersfield Giants is apparently his likely destination.
Opinions vary on whether Percival should be given two more years at Saints. I personally think we have enough depth now in Robertson, Dagnall, Nene McDonald and Deon Cross to let him go. He isn’t the player he was. But there is a way of handling things and I would be as mortified as the biggest Percival fans among the fan base to think that he could be treated badly after his excellent service.
While taking the club’s denials of Wilkin’s allegations at face value, you can’t help but wonder about his claims. As he stated during the broadcast the people on the inside at Saints are his friends after his long association with the club as a player. What would be his motivation for making this sort of gossip up out of nothing? All I can really think of is his continuing quest to get his own chat show on prime time BBC1 on a Saturday night. He’s not camera shy, to understate things a tad.
Yet if there is absolutely nothing in the claims why is Rush stepping down now? Why wasn't this addressed during the three month long off season? His statement is mostly vanilla platitudes about how fantastic it has been for a boyhood fan to have been in such a privileged position behind the scenes.
Perhaps deliberately it doesn’t address the claims. But his sudden decision to leave his post is going to be enough to persuade some that there is weight behind what Wilkin is saying. Even I find it hard to reconcile the idea that it was always his intention to step down after the first game of a new season. Especially with all the other change that has come about this off season. It just feels...untidy.
It's a slightly worrying time to be a Saints fan, then. Our on field reset has already hit the buffers with a flat performance in defeat to Warrington. Next up is Leigh, another side we failed to beat in 2025. And whatever the truth of the reasoning behind Rush's exit there's clearly some instability off the field as well as on. The search for a replacement should have a wide enough scope to consider those who have performed a similar role in other industries. The new person needs to be a good negotiator. They don't need extensive rugby league knowledge. Recruitment can be delegated.
We knew that 2026 would have the feel of a new broom sweeping after the stagnation since the Woolf years. And change can be good, even if it's unexpectedly forced. But the club has to get this right to get the ship back on course.